When I use Auto-Scale Wavevorm (in order to conveniently display low-level sounds) it appears that every single clip is scaled individually. This causes the waveform of some very low level clips, like room-tone, to be blown up out of proportion.
Is this normal behaviour, is it a bug, or have I overlooked a setting in the preferences ?
Kees de Visser
Galaxy Classics
Auto-Scale Waveform, different scales per clip ?
Forum rules
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the tech support request form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the tech support request form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 19:51
Re: Auto-Scale Waveform, different scales per clip ?
Kees de Visser wrote:
Is this normal behaviour, is it a bug, or have I overlooked a setting in the preferences ?
It's old bug. Auto Scaling must scale all visible clips proportional, not every clip individually.
Andrey Subbotin
Re: Auto-Scale Waveform, different scales per clip ?
Professor wrote:Kees de Visser wrote:
Is this normal behaviour, is it a bug, or have I overlooked a setting in the preferences ?
It's old bug. Auto Scaling must scale all visible clips proportional, not every clip individually.
Bug or intended behavior, it drives me crazy that this is going on. I do a lot of audiobook editing/mastering and with all the edited room tone in my projects using 'autoscale' makes it really hard to see what's going on, and I find myself toggling back and forth between waveform scalings quite a bit. This is another item I really miss from Sonic. Merging, can you consider autoscaling waveform to media instead of individual clips?
Thanks,
Steve
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 12:19
- Location: Switzerland
Hi all,
This issue/improvement is already present in our Database, known as MT000787. We'll raise the priority for it.
Do some of you want to keep the current behavior and in addition have a Global auto-scale option? Or we should simply change the behavior to Global auto-scale, that's all.
Thanks,
Ricardo
Merging Technologies
This issue/improvement is already present in our Database, known as MT000787. We'll raise the priority for it.
Do some of you want to keep the current behavior and in addition have a Global auto-scale option? Or we should simply change the behavior to Global auto-scale, that's all.
Thanks,
Ricardo
Merging Technologies
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Fri Sep 27, 2002 19:51
Ricardo Ryan wrote:Hi all,
This issue/improvement is already present in our Database, known as MT000787. We'll raise the priority for it.
Good news, thank you !
Do some of you want to keep the current behavior and in addition have a Global auto-scale option? Or we should simply change the behavior to Global auto-scale, that's all.
I'd vote for a "Global auto-scale" only since I don't like the current behaviour and wouldn't use if it were an option. But that's probably because I don't see any benefits in using the current behaviour. Anyone who does ?
On the other hand, amongst the myriads of Pyramix options, one more wouldn't harm, would it ? :)
Hi Ricardo,
This is great news! I'm with Kees in that I can't see a use for the current behavior but I have no objection to having it as an option.
Regards,
Steve
This is great news! I'm with Kees in that I can't see a use for the current behavior but I have no objection to having it as an option.
Regards,
Steve
Kees de Visser wrote:Ricardo Ryan wrote:Hi all,
This issue/improvement is already present in our Database, known as MT000787. We'll raise the priority for it.
Good news, thank you !Do some of you want to keep the current behavior and in addition have a Global auto-scale option? Or we should simply change the behavior to Global auto-scale, that's all.
I'd vote for a "Global auto-scale" only since I don't like the current behaviour and wouldn't use if it were an option. But that's probably because I don't see any benefits in using the current behaviour. Anyone who does ?
On the other hand, amongst the myriads of Pyramix options, one more wouldn't harm, would it ?
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2004 12:19
- Location: Switzerland