OMF Export

Self-explained! ;-)
Forum rules
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the tech support request form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!
User avatar
Sylvain94
Posts: 325
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 17:20
Location: Paris, France
Contact:

OMF Export

Postby Sylvain94 » Sat Apr 03, 2004 18:24

What about a OMF Export function, for me it will be very usefull when you have to export your project to another workstation or to a video editing station

NICK LOWE
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2003 13:58

Postby NICK LOWE » Sun Apr 04, 2004 16:48

excellente idee

davy lamb
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 00:39
Location: Belfast

Postby davy lamb » Mon Apr 19, 2004 21:21

this gets my vote too.

User avatar
ChrisDomaille
Posts: 8
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 21:18
Location: Bristol, England
Contact:

Postby ChrisDomaille » Wed May 19, 2004 12:01

Yep Like it or not, it is still the most universal file exchange system.
Also it gives another layer of compatability with the "Industry Standard" which I believe does not accept AES 31!!
I'm pretty sure AAF's not far off. this should be the "new OMF"

Chris

Adrian
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 22:41

Avid Unity

Postby Adrian » Mon May 24, 2004 14:36

If a topic is needing votes then here's mine. If PMX can hook up to Unity and read omfs then it has got to be able to put them back. I've just finished a huge awards show 10 versions all different lengths and based on a generic full length version which was two hours long. This version had to be digitised back in to the Avids to be cut down. Oh for omf export.

tim lofts
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 12:34
Contact:

Postby tim lofts » Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:10

A big definite yes from me too. I'ts caused me a couple of problems, nearly lost a job recently because of the lack of omf export.

avenueaudio
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 23:37
Location: Chicago,IL
Contact:

Postby avenueaudio » Sat Oct 23, 2004 15:19

Bumping this up again. This is a huge MUST. Making opentl then converting them to OMF is a joke. AAF is not far off but it is still in the distance. Please make this a priority.

Thanks,
Cory Coken
Avenue Audio
www.avenueaudio.com

User avatar
Daniel Bélanger
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 18:20
Location: PARIS FRANCE
Contact:

Postby Daniel Bélanger » Fri Nov 19, 2004 20:26

I agree this is a must
Daniel

Julian Gough
Posts: 226
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 00:19
Location: Stoke Poges, UK

Postby Julian Gough » Mon Nov 22, 2004 21:29

avenueaudio wrote:Bumping this up again. This is a huge MUST. Making opentl then converting them to OMF is a joke. AAF is not far off but it is still in the distance. Please make this a priority.


Now that AAF is available, has anyone used it yet, and if so what are their thoughts?

Julian

tim lofts
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 12:34
Contact:

Postby tim lofts » Thu Dec 09, 2004 15:22

I've just discovered we lost a whole campaign of commercials and trailers over the last month purely because of the lack of OMF export. One of my long standing clients has been using another studio on a project that requires daily transfer of material ,because the video house doing the visuals kept complaining I couldn't give them an OMF to re-import audio to their Avids.

There is a guy in the UK, John Emmas at Creative Post in Manchester, whoI understand is a bit of an OMF guru. We thought we might give him a try to write something for us, but does anyone else have experience here? If nothing else, Merging should be addressing this as a matter of prority. I am really hacked off at the moment!

Dominique Brulhart
Posts: 168
Joined: Wed May 15, 2002 16:06
Location: Geneva, Switzerland
Contact:

Postby Dominique Brulhart » Fri Dec 10, 2004 09:25

Hi all,

Since 10 years that we're fighting with OMF we haven't seen two similar OMF implementations on any DAW, especially on the audio side. This is mostly why we've decided not to implement the OMF export... not to have to basically code one version for each target DAW... (as we have internally for the import).

This is also why we've concentrated our efforts on direct import/export of many (if not all) other formats to accommodate all standards we could (Akai, CMX, AES31, OpenTL, Protools, Sonic).

At the same time we've been keeping a close eye on AAF since its beginning waiting for it to be defined/speced enough and to have some other players compatible with each others. This is now seems to be the case and Pyramix 4.3 does actually implement AAF (import and export)... and it works OK with Protools, Sadie... and some Avid stations.

This said we're now in a situation where, now that the whole industry is moving to AAF, we may reach a point where nobody updates its OMF code and where we could finally have it stable and crystallized. This may become the OMF gold era ;-)

Be sure that we’ve carefully read this thread and understood your wishes. Without any promise we may consider to finally make an OMF export… but to be honest it will certainly require some time during which AAF will be perfectly operational.

Thanks for your patience and understanding

Best regards,

Dominique