Hi everyone,
This is a guide I made on working with multiple sources and multiple destinations in a similar way to how you would work with playlists in Pro Tools.
If you just want to read the guide without the chit chat here is a link to a pdf version. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vVh_PrdlrGaM15ysDTN1KPtBAIyKt82k/view?usp=sharing.
It's a bit more tidy and you can go to page 4-5 if you want to jump straight to the multiple sources and multiple destinations workflow that is similar the workflow of playlists in Pro Tools.
So I watched the live presentation on Pyramix “tips and tricks editing”. Great stuff by the way, on all of them. And while most of it is pretty known to me on the subjects, there are always some small things to take from them no matter how well I thought I knew the subject, or just another way of doing something that you can integrate into your own workflow. Love it!
Anyway on the last one “tips and tricks” someone asked if it was possible to use multiple destinations in S/D editing, and while the given answer was great (I learned some new tricks), I felt it was maybe not quite what was being asked. Because I had a similar question when I came from Pro Tools and started working in Pyramix. Something like “What is happening with these playlists?" and "There has to be a better way?”. And a lot pointed towards Source and Destination editing. But what was that, and how would I integrate all those functions into a workflow, and what workflow. Digging into what’s available on that subject only helped so much. I got all the this does that and this does that, but not the “how can I put this together into a workflow to replace the playlist function”. This is the workflow I eventually came up with. It’s pretty close to the Pro Tools workflow of overdubbing with playlists, although quite a bit more complicated but also more flexible. And once it’s in your fingertips it’s pretty close to as fast as well, just with a lot more options.
This is a step by step guide on how to work with multiple Sources and multiple Destinations in Pyramix, teaspoon style. Giving you a sort of visual playlist system similar to that of Pro Tools, just more complicated and flexible. Let’s start from the beginning.
Create a new project.
Here I’ve created a project with 10 tracks to start. This will be our main takes for this example.
We then go on to make our source destination groups. We can wait til after recording. I like to get it done before the session starts.
Start with a group called for example Live destination and assign all tracks to it.
(In real life I like to put a “d” in front of all destination groups and “s” in front of all sources. So a group might be called dLive, and its source would be sLive. Or for an overdub it might be dVoc, and its sources would be called sVoc1 (take 1), sVoc2 (take 2), sVoc3 (take 3) etc).
Now duplicate that group and call it Live Source. You can see the options I have chosen on the groups. I’ve collapsed the destination and armed my source. I am now ready to record my main takes.
Now that we've done the main recordings with the whole band I’ve assigned source and destination function to the groups and I can edit as with normal source destination (The Merging Youtube page has a great video on that).
Sometimes I won’t use S/D on the main takes. I will just record one take after the other and edit between them, and dub under the chosen take.
But for this example it’s better to start with S/D from the start.
Now we’ve done our S/D editing and have a complete take ready for overdubs. As you can see I have turned Auto Solo off now and muted the clips and the tracks on the source group(safety measure). I have also turned on Auto hide on the source, so as soon as I click anywhere on my destination all the source tracks will hide (I’m done with them and don’t need to actively see it in my timeline anymore).
As you can see all source tracks are hidden. If you need to see them again later for some reason you can unhide them by selecting one of the tracks related to that group in the Track List.
Now we’re ready for overdubs. Let’s say one of the guitarists wants to add a solo. We’ll use two tracks for the solo. I’ve set up two tracks and assigned them to a group. Our future destination group. I’ve duplicated that group making our first source group, our if you will, our first playlist.
And named it sSolo take1. I’ve also copied this text “sSolo take” to my clipboard for later use. And collapsed the destination group. No need for that to take up any extra space yet. You can assign source destination types to the groups now. Sometimes I do now, sometimes I don’t do it before I’m about to start editing. I’ve also added the option of free markers so I can add markers to that take/group.
Let’s record. Arm the sSolo take1 group tracks and record. If you have “prompt for name” on, you could also name the clips something like Guitar solo take 1. Then you find some excuse to talk with the guitarist, maybe about the take, or maybe he wants to listen to it. While you do that you set up for a new take(this can be done while playing back take 1). If it’s not already selected select our sSolo take1 group and click in the duplicate field. Paste the “sSolo take” in and add a “2”. So it becomes “sSolo take2”.
Two new tracks are created, and the guitarist is done listening. You unarm the tracks (if you haven’t already) and mute the sSolo take1 tracks and arm the sSolo take2 tracks. Ready for take 2. Some might like to add a lot of duplicates beforehand so you have ready made track for new takes, I like to make them as they’re needed. It takes 2 seconds once you get used to the workflow. You can also add auto collapse to the previous groups/takes so they take up less real estate on the screen.
Now we’ve done 3 takes. I’ve spread them out so the next part will be easier to see. I’ve turned on auto mute on all the relevant groups. Also remember to assign type if you didn't earlier, Source on all takes and Destination on our dSolo group.
We’re almost ready to edit. But first we must set up two macros. This is to enable easy vertical S/D editing. Similar to how you would work with playlists in Pro Tools. And yes “Gate In to Cursor” needs to be there 2 times. Assign the two new macros to easy shortcuts. I have them on 4 and 5.
Now we are ready. Select the part you want from take 1.
Now press your shortcut to trigger the “Gates to Selection Cursor to start” macro. It should look like this. With the gates set to the selection.
Next click with the mouse anywhere on the destination tracks timeline (all we are doing is selecting the destination tracks). After that press your shortcut to trigger the “Vertical S to D” macro. Your selection should now be moved up to the destination.
So as I have my macros assigned to 4 and 5 all I do is leave my left fingers over 4 and 5 and my right hand on the mouse. Select, 4, click, 5 and repeat. That is pretty much as fast as working in Pro Tools with playlists, but a lot more flexible. Also, you don’t have to move them vertically you could also mix this with normal S/D editing if you’d like to move something in time too
Our edit is done, a weird very quiet solo edit. But before we go on we can hide all the sources. But we should remember our safety measures.
I over do this a bit and mute all source clips and mute the tracks. One or the other should be just fine. I’m just not taking any chances for a hidden track to suddenly end up in the mix. If you mute the tracks remember to turn off auto mute(safety).
And last for reference here is the timeline with nothing hidden.
And that’s pretty much it. Repeat for as many overdubs you’d like.
Hope you like it, hope it was helpful for some. If you have any questions or anything was unclear. Just let me know.
A guide to overdubbing with multiple sources and multiple destinations. Similar to Pro Tools playlists
Forum rules
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the tech support request form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the tech support request form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 23:03
A guide to overdubbing with multiple sources and multiple destinations. Similar to Pro Tools playlists
Last edited by NikolaiGabriel on Sun Jun 07, 2020 17:23, edited 3 times in total.
All the best
Nikolai Gabriel
Pyramix Masscore
Windows 10 Pro 1903
ASRock Z370m, Intel i7 8700K, 16GB RAM, Nivida GT 1030.
Horus and Hapi - 3.9.7
Nikolai Gabriel
Pyramix Masscore
Windows 10 Pro 1903
ASRock Z370m, Intel i7 8700K, 16GB RAM, Nivida GT 1030.
Horus and Hapi - 3.9.7
Re: A guide to overdubbing with multiple sources and multiple destinations. Similar to Pro Tools playlists
Nice presentation.
Have you tried Pyramix's own Playlist function for your overdubs, rather than creating new Tracks for each new Take?
Have you tried Pyramix's own Playlist function for your overdubs, rather than creating new Tracks for each new Take?
Frank Lockwood, Toronto, ON, Canada
• Pyramix Native 11.1.6
• Mac Mini 6.2 (3rd Gen. Quadcore i7) - Bootcamp 6.0.6136 - Win10 Pro SP1 64 v1809
• RME Fireface 800 ASIO driver 3.125 or ASIO4All 2.15
• Pyramix Native 11.1.6
• Mac Mini 6.2 (3rd Gen. Quadcore i7) - Bootcamp 6.0.6136 - Win10 Pro SP1 64 v1809
• RME Fireface 800 ASIO driver 3.125 or ASIO4All 2.15
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 23:03
Re: A guide to overdubbing with multiple sources and multiple destinations. Similar to Pro Tools playlists
fl wrote:Nice presentation.
Have you tried Pyramix's own Playlist function for your overdubs, rather than creating new Tracks for each new Take?
Thank you! Yes I have, I find it to be pretty close to pure chaos. Looking partly away from all the bugs that plague it, the lack of visual overview alone is almost enough for me to stay away. Working this way is for me at least a lot faster and flexible in the end.
All the best
Nikolai Gabriel
Pyramix Masscore
Windows 10 Pro 1903
ASRock Z370m, Intel i7 8700K, 16GB RAM, Nivida GT 1030.
Horus and Hapi - 3.9.7
Nikolai Gabriel
Pyramix Masscore
Windows 10 Pro 1903
ASRock Z370m, Intel i7 8700K, 16GB RAM, Nivida GT 1030.
Horus and Hapi - 3.9.7
Re: A guide to overdubbing with multiple sources and multiple destinations. Similar to Pro Tools playlists
Brilliant stuff Nikolai- thanks for taking the time to put this together.
That was me asking questions the other day- your workflow example is exactly the scenario I was curios about.
As always there a a number of ways you can get the job done- this looks like a good way to go.
cheers!
That was me asking questions the other day- your workflow example is exactly the scenario I was curios about.
As always there a a number of ways you can get the job done- this looks like a good way to go.
cheers!
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 23:03
Re: A guide to overdubbing with multiple sources and multiple destinations. Similar to Pro Tools playlists
a.stinson wrote:Brilliant stuff Nikolai- thanks for taking the time to put this together.
That was me asking questions the other day- your workflow example is exactly the scenario I was curios about.
As always there a a number of ways you can get the job done- this looks like a good way to go.
cheers!
No problem. I'm glad to see you found it here and that I interpreted your question right.
This workflow made such a huge difference for me in my enjoyment of Pyramix so seeing your question I though it might make a difference for you too, and then maybe others, so I was more then happy to put this together.
Yes, especially in Pyramix. I have come to love how open it is for users to find they're own workflow, but sometimes I've felt like I've had to reinvent the wheel coming up with how to put workflows together and wondered if I found the most effective way of doing things. In that way these live streams have been a great way of seeing how other wheels have been built, and being able to compare and integrate with my own.
All the best
Nikolai Gabriel
Pyramix Masscore
Windows 10 Pro 1903
ASRock Z370m, Intel i7 8700K, 16GB RAM, Nivida GT 1030.
Horus and Hapi - 3.9.7
Nikolai Gabriel
Pyramix Masscore
Windows 10 Pro 1903
ASRock Z370m, Intel i7 8700K, 16GB RAM, Nivida GT 1030.
Horus and Hapi - 3.9.7
Re: A guide to overdubbing with multiple sources and multiple destinations. Similar to Pro Tools playlists
NikolaiGabriel wrote:fl wrote:Nice presentation.
Have you tried Pyramix's own Playlist function for your overdubs, rather than creating new Tracks for each new Take?
Thank you! Yes I have, I find it to be pretty close to pure chaos. Looking partly away from all the bugs that plague it, the lack of visual overview alone is almost enough for me to stay away. Working this way is for me at least a lot faster and flexible in the end.
Certainly it's going to be a question of what you're used to, and after a decade of using Playlists, I prefer their use. I find them beneficial while doing whole multi-track takes or individually tracked overdubs - they allow me to keep my Mixer and its routing simpler. Fewer Clips in the Timeline means that Pyramix operates more responsively, which I believe would be the case for any DAW.
There is the requirement that, to preserve already existing Playlists, all Tracks have to maintain their place in the overall Track running order, with new ones being added below/after. Before I started using Playlists, I had been used to the "Bottom to Top" arrangement provided in the S-D Editing Template that comes with Pyramix, but it wasn't difficult for me to switch to a "Top to Bottom" scheme, which allows me to track with a simple set-up, and to add Tracks safely at any stage of the project, while preserving my existing Playlists.
Pyramix is most certainly not bug free, but I can't say, apart from what I just mentioned, that I've encountered many bugs with Pyramix's Playlist implementation - much less a "plague" of them - yet it's very possible that I've simply never attempted anything similar to where you've encountered them. I don't expect I'd have much success trying to convert you to Playlist use, especially in light of my only having occasional need to record overdubs/punch-ins (as opposed to recording and re-recording whole, multi-track takes with all performers) but when I've encountered that requirement, dealing with monitoring and latency issues occupied my attention far more than anything that could have arisen from Playlist use. And, truth be told, I've never been much of a Pro Tools user, which doubtlessly affects expectations going both ways.
Frank Lockwood, Toronto, ON, Canada
• Pyramix Native 11.1.6
• Mac Mini 6.2 (3rd Gen. Quadcore i7) - Bootcamp 6.0.6136 - Win10 Pro SP1 64 v1809
• RME Fireface 800 ASIO driver 3.125 or ASIO4All 2.15
• Pyramix Native 11.1.6
• Mac Mini 6.2 (3rd Gen. Quadcore i7) - Bootcamp 6.0.6136 - Win10 Pro SP1 64 v1809
• RME Fireface 800 ASIO driver 3.125 or ASIO4All 2.15
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2016 23:03
Re: A guide to overdubbing with multiple sources and multiple destinations. Similar to Pro Tools playlists
fl wrote:NikolaiGabriel wrote:fl wrote:Nice presentation.
Have you tried Pyramix's own Playlist function for your overdubs, rather than creating new Tracks for each new Take?
Thank you! Yes I have, I find it to be pretty close to pure chaos. Looking partly away from all the bugs that plague it, the lack of visual overview alone is almost enough for me to stay away. Working this way is for me at least a lot faster and flexible in the end.
Certainly it's going to be a question of what you're used to, and after a decade of using Playlists, I prefer their use. I find them beneficial while doing whole multi-track takes or individually tracked overdubs - they allow me to keep my Mixer and its routing simpler. Fewer Clips in the Timeline means that Pyramix operates more responsively, which I believe would be the case for any DAW.
There is the requirement that, to preserve already existing Playlists, all Tracks have to maintain their place in the overall Track running order, with new ones being added below/after. Before I started using Playlists, I had been used to the "Bottom to Top" arrangement provided in the S-D Editing Template that comes with Pyramix, but it wasn't difficult for me to switch to a "Top to Bottom" scheme, which allows me to track with a simple set-up, and to add Tracks safely at any stage of the project, while preserving my existing Playlists.
Pyramix is most certainly not bug free, but I can't say, apart from what I just mentioned, that I've encountered many bugs with Pyramix's Playlist implementation - much less a "plague" of them - yet it's very possible that I've simply never attempted anything similar to where you've encountered them. I don't expect I'd have much success trying to convert you to Playlist use, especially in light of my only having occasional need to record overdubs/punch-ins (as opposed to recording and re-recording whole, multi-track takes with all performers) but when I've encountered that requirement, dealing with monitoring and latency issues occupied my attention far more than anything that could have arisen from Playlist use. And, truth be told, I've never been much of a Pro Tools user, which doubtlessly affects expectations going both ways.
It sure is. As all things whatever works for you etc. I see that. For me it got more complicated. Especially with the lack of visual conformation on which playlist you are in, and the the danger of making a mistake at some point moving a track and have something that is very difficult/time consuming to set right. As for the routing I don't see how it gets more complicated. All tracks automatically assign to the strips as the previous tracks in the group.
Yes, that is an issue, that the responsiveness goes down. I hope a fix will come there soon. No that does not seem to be an issue with most other daws. I can speak for sure that Pro Tools did not have that issue when I left it 2-3 years ago.
I haven't used Pyramix's playlist function for over a year now. I don't remember the list I sent Merging back then, you might be right. But from what I remember what bothered me the most was that you could not rearrange tracks once one playlist was in play, the lack of playlist indication, not being able to see all the playlists at once, and some issues I had with making playlist, and loosing clips from the timeline/playlist(user error I'm guessing). The Pro Tools playlist is a combination of how you describe using the playlist function and the visual function of working as I have described above. I would not say no thanks if Merging updated to something similar. Giving you the choice if you'd like to work with collapsed playlist tracks as you are(just with indication), or uncollapsed as my workflow simulates.
Yes I've always worked top to bottom, still do, but I like the freedom to change track order for whatever reason should I feel it would make my work easier and faster in a given situation. You could of course hide tracks to get rid of tracks in between so you get the tracks you want beside each other for a given task, in Pyramix there is usually a way. I've just chosen a workflow which to me feels like it gives me the most freedom without having to feel like I'm walking on eggshells.
Haha, no I don't think you will, not as long as it is how it is now. But I have read your guides to it here on the forum, and that was great! That at least gave me a fighting chance before I found this way of working. And following that guide it works. I just wasn't satisfied by how it works.
Most of what I do is recording everything live, with no overdubs. But in overdub this takes no brain effort for me anymore. Regarding latency I just keep it analog for the monitoring now. Being able to selectively turn off/on ADC on single strips/buses I feel would help though.
I have no more love for Pro Tools then for Pyramix (looking away from the companies making the software, there Pyramix wins hands down no competition). Pyramix gives me what matters most, a better end result. As for how they differ, there are things I think Pro Tools does better, and there are things I think Pyramix does better. And I think there are a few relatively easy small things that should/could be implemented to make Pyramix far superior.
All the best
Nikolai Gabriel
Pyramix Masscore
Windows 10 Pro 1903
ASRock Z370m, Intel i7 8700K, 16GB RAM, Nivida GT 1030.
Horus and Hapi - 3.9.7
Nikolai Gabriel
Pyramix Masscore
Windows 10 Pro 1903
ASRock Z370m, Intel i7 8700K, 16GB RAM, Nivida GT 1030.
Horus and Hapi - 3.9.7