Using BWF files has proved problematic in the past in cases where Pyramix places files based on the BWF chunk, rather than file name, which is a problem when there are children files created after working with external processing (iZotope RX for example.)
Will using BWF make surround channel/file handling easier when working with big channel counts?
Media Manager mounting rules seem to be unpredictable when you get beyond 5.1 channels in cases where I'm using regular .wav or AIFF files.
When BWF
Forum rules
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the tech support request form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the tech support request form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!
-
Perfect Record
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 06:09
- Location: St Paul, Minnesota USA
- Contact:
When BWF
Pyramix Fanatic
http://www.perfect-record.com
http://www.perfect-record.com