I'm not talking about the 32b/64b driver issues
How do you like this controller operationally?
How do you like EuCon?
Forum rules
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the bug reporting form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the bug reporting form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!
-
Perfect Record
- Posts: 646
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 06:09
- Location: St Paul, Minnesota USA
- Contact:
Re: How do you like EuCon?
Hi,
We have a Euphonix 5mc, a little Artist series desk (Control and Mix) and also 3 Tangos here.
The first thing that I would say about the Eucon/Oasis combination is that compared to the Tango/Oasis it uses a LOT of memory.
We have fairly hefty sessions with a lot of automation and there is a very obvious difference when the Pyramix has Eucon running compared to how it performs with the Tango.
The 32/64 bit issue is very concerning for us - having 2G memory limit is crippling the system using Eucon - If it's a smaller project and the pyramix is running with sufficient memory (process <800M) then it works really well, but on larger projects the system struggles with that memory limit.
Under low memory conditions the pyramix is a lot less stable, and if/when the Pyramix crashes it can cause the 5MC to lose connection to its modules, and then it's a time-consuming reset needed.
We're really hoping that Merging and Avid can address this fairly quickly. Ironically we have the 20 fader tangos in our smaller theatres, but they can cope with larger and more complex projects than the larger 5mc (or artist) using Eucon at the moment.
Happy to provide more info if you need it
Graham
We have a Euphonix 5mc, a little Artist series desk (Control and Mix) and also 3 Tangos here.
The first thing that I would say about the Eucon/Oasis combination is that compared to the Tango/Oasis it uses a LOT of memory.
We have fairly hefty sessions with a lot of automation and there is a very obvious difference when the Pyramix has Eucon running compared to how it performs with the Tango.
The 32/64 bit issue is very concerning for us - having 2G memory limit is crippling the system using Eucon - If it's a smaller project and the pyramix is running with sufficient memory (process <800M) then it works really well, but on larger projects the system struggles with that memory limit.
Under low memory conditions the pyramix is a lot less stable, and if/when the Pyramix crashes it can cause the 5MC to lose connection to its modules, and then it's a time-consuming reset needed.
We're really hoping that Merging and Avid can address this fairly quickly. Ironically we have the 20 fader tangos in our smaller theatres, but they can cope with larger and more complex projects than the larger 5mc (or artist) using Eucon at the moment.
Happy to provide more info if you need it
Graham
Filmsat59.com
Pre and Post production Services
Bristol
UK
Pre and Post production Services
Bristol
UK