Pyramix not transparent

Welcome to the Pyramix MassCore discussion forum.
Forum rules
The Merging Technologies team cannot be held responsible for support queries logged on the public forums. If a support query is logged here and only here, it may not be found and dealt with by the appropriate team.
To ensure that your support issue or bug report is dealt with properly and in good time, please use the link to the tech support request form page on the Merging website.
Make sure to let us know what version you are using when you send your mail. THANKS!

Pyramix not transparent

Postby Lars Nilsson » Fri Feb 02, 2018 01:00

When I put a single stereo file on timeline, set the fader to -0.1 or 0.1 dB and export it using Mix Down, the result sounds different than the source file.

The difference is subtle, but audible - I'm able to pick the Pyramix file in proper ABX double blind test with 100% confidence. The difference is most definitely more than 0.1 dB of gain.

There are no plugins on my inserts, no dithering, no other proccessing, panner is set to None and source and output formats match. I have left most of the settings on default. Both of the files have plenty of headroom and no clipping.

Anyone expirienced this? Am I doing something wrong? I'm complete newbie to the Pyramix.
Lars Nilsson
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 00:54

Re: Pyramix not transparent

Postby fl » Sun Feb 04, 2018 19:39

Firstly, which version of Pyramix are you running these tests with? My comments below will refer to version 11.0.5.

Lars Nilsson wrote:When I put a single stereo file on timeline, set the fader to -0.1 or 0.1 dB and export it using Mix Down, the result sounds different than the source file.

What happens if you apply 0.0 db? Perceive any difference? Invert the polarity of this mixdown file and then mix it with your original file. Does it null properly?

The difference is subtle, but audible - I'm able to pick the Pyramix file in proper ABX double blind test with 100% confidence. The difference is most definitely more than 0.1 dB of gain.

Going back to your 0.1 dB gain change experiments, what wordlength did you select for the output file? 16 bit? 24 bit? 32 bit? Try 32 bit and see if you still hear a difference in sound quality. I'll assume that you chose to output to a WAV or an MTFF file format (you certainly don't want to use one of the data compressed formats for this experiment).

Also, what happens if you change the panning scheme used to send the source file's mixer strip output to the Mix Bus, from a Panner to a Routing to the Mix Bus? You do this by clicking on the Red "Pan" at the very top of the Strip - click on it and change from Pan to the Routing Options, where you'll set the L side of the source signal to send 100% to the Mix Bus's L input, and the R, 100% to the MB's R. (See the manual page 227.) I'm curious whether the use of the panpot vs. direct routing makes any difference to what you're hearing.

What happens if you do a Mix with the Strip gain set at -0.1 dB gain, and then do a second mix, with the gain at -0.2 dB - and then compare those two through your ABX test?

There are no plugins on my inserts, no dithering, no other proccessing, panner is set to None and source and output formats match. I have left most of the settings on default. Both of the files have plenty of headroom and no clipping.
Anyone expirienced this? Am I doing something wrong? I'm complete newbie to the Pyramix.

I believe you'd be hard pressed to find any DAW which does not impart some change to a file when you run it through its mixer, especially when you've applied some gain change. Even a minuscule gain change will result in a completely re-written file, since the change of gain requires the whole file to be re-calculated. Pyramix uses 32 bit floating point math for its mixdown, as do a lot of DAWs these days. However, some DAWs are going to be kinder to the mixdown results than others.

To be fair, mixing a two track file down through a two track Mix Bus isn't something that a lot of people are going to be doing all that often, unless they want to change it in some way (gain, effects, etc.). I'm reminded of a quotation from famed mastering engineer Bob Ohlsson which I thought was so incisive that it's printed out and hanging on my wall:

"Signal Processing is always a trade-off between sonic degradation and a perceived improvement in sound."
Frank Lockwood, Toronto, ON, Canada
http://LockwoodARS.com
Native 11.1.5/Native Music 9.1.10
Win7 Pro SP1 64/32
Bootcamp 5.1.5621/4.0.4033
Mac Mini 6.2 (Quadcore i7)/MacBook Pro 3.1 (Core2Duo)
RME Fireface 800, driver version 3.124
User avatar
fl
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 19:55
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Pyramix not transparent

Postby DJS » Mon Feb 05, 2018 22:25

I believe you'd be hard pressed to find any DAW which does not impart some change to a file when you run it through its mixer, especially when you've applied some gain change. Even a minuscule gain change will result in a completely re-written file, since the change of gain requires the whole file to be re-calculated.

This should definitely be transparent and inaudible. Gain is a benign change. Something must be broken if audible.
David Spearritt
Classical and Acoustic Music, BNE, Australia
DJS
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 05:26
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Pyramix not transparent

Postby Lars Nilsson » Tue Feb 06, 2018 01:36

Many thanks for both of the replies!

Actually, I did a null test when doing this experiment. Pyramix nulled just to something around -100 dB. When I boosted the remaining signal, I was able to hear the source material.

I have tried this exact experiment with some other DAWs. Every time the result nulled to the source file to over -150dB, and the remaining signal was just noise, no traces of the source material when boosted.

When the fader is set to 0, the resulting file is bit-to-bit copy of original file, but -0.1 dB file DOESN'T null to the -0.2 file or +0.1 file when volume matched. Switching from a Panner to a Routing to the Mix Bus yelded just slightly better results (files nulled to 120dB, source material is still audible when boosted), but I have learned a lot about Pyramix routing while doing this. :-) I think the routing in Pyramix is brilliant.

I'm using 32bit lossless format when exporting any files and I'm using Pyramix 10.
Lars Nilsson
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 00:54

Re: Pyramix not transparent

Postby Lars Nilsson » Sun Feb 11, 2018 21:32

Would someone of you proccess my audio clip in your Pyramix, to see if we get the same results, please?

I'm sure I must do something wrong.
Lars Nilsson
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 00:54

Re: Pyramix not transparent

Postby fl » Mon Feb 12, 2018 17:44

Lars Nilsson wrote:Actually, I did a null test when doing this experiment. Pyramix nulled just to something around -100 dB. When I boosted the remaining signal, I was able to hear the source material.

How are you measuring this? How do you arrive at the number -100 dB?

What is/are the audio file format(s) involved? Same file format for the Mixdown as was used for the source material? Wordlength? Sample Rate?

Are you using Pyramix's Mixdown window, or are you using Album Publishing, to generate the output files?

If using the Mixdown window, are any of the Processing Options (on the right side of the window) enabled? What about Settings for the output file format (Settings button right beside the file format selector)? Do you own a FinalCheck license? If so, is it enabled?

Is there any chance that Dither is enabled in the mixer?

When the fader is set to 0, the resulting file is bit-to-bit copy of original file, but -0.1 dB file DOESN'T null to the -0.2 file or +0.1 file when volume matched.

And how are you "matching" the levels? What method are you using to invert the polarity of one of the waveforms prior to running a Null Test?

I'm using 32bit lossless format when exporting any files and I'm using Pyramix 10.

Do you mean to say that you're using 32 bit FLAC files for making the mixdowns and subsequent comparisons?

Why not use WAV? Or MTFF?

Is the original source file 32 bit Floating point? Are the mixdowns?

You say you're using Pyramix 10 - which version?

Which version of Windows?

Is this Pyramix Native or Mass Core? If Native, what is your audio interface and connection protocol (ASIO?)?

Do you have Real Time Sample Rate Conversion enabled in the Pyramix Settings?

Giving a complete rundown of your soft and hardware set-up would be helpful.
Frank Lockwood, Toronto, ON, Canada
http://LockwoodARS.com
Native 11.1.5/Native Music 9.1.10
Win7 Pro SP1 64/32
Bootcamp 5.1.5621/4.0.4033
Mac Mini 6.2 (Quadcore i7)/MacBook Pro 3.1 (Core2Duo)
RME Fireface 800, driver version 3.124
User avatar
fl
 
Posts: 1277
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 19:55
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Re: Pyramix not transparent

Postby ljudatervinning » Sat Feb 24, 2018 21:38

Check Dithering in the mixer.
I believe dither to 16 bit is on by default on Mixbus.
Right click in mixer -> Settings -> Dithering
Pyramix Native 11.0.6 / 11.1.5 / Ravenna ASIO 11.1.5
win10 Pro 1709 / Nvidia GTX 670, 3 monitors
win10 Pro 1803 / Lenovo P50, 4K
ljudatervinning
 
Posts: 65
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 00:00
Location: Sweden

Re: Pyramix not transparent

Postby per » Wed Mar 07, 2018 13:10

Interesting test!

My bet is that the output format you are producing has a higher resolution than the original format. If the original is a 16 bit wav file and you produce a 32 bit wav file (or mtff), then the output has a higher resolution and you will hear a difference when you try to null them out. The fact that you actually hear the material undistorted when you boost the difference speaks in favour of this explanation.

Another explanation could be that dither is in fact on, but then the difference would be noise.

I'm also a bit fascinated that you can actually hear an "error" that is 100 dB down from 0 dBFS. I'm hugely impressed! :)

Per
Sound Processing AB
Sweden
per
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2003 18:21
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden


Return to Pyramix General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 16 guests